If music is truly an emotional experience, then perhaps there’s no better way to get your politically-charged points across in an appealing fashion than through your own music. Perhaps the advent of big-time music videos and producers can help you along the way. Personally speaking, much of today’s music seeking to stand behind any political or social issue seems highly transparent. Instead, I want to discuss a period in which one band’s music possessed the smarts and musical craft needed to make strong political statements on the world.
In 1980, British rock/reggae/punk-inspired outfit, The Police, released their third album Ghost in The Machine. Boo Browning from The Washington Post breaks down each song of the album as they individually cover several topics relating to the current world condition as well as the human psyche itself, all the while parading as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The sheep’s clothing, of course, referring to the excellent musicianship from Andy Summers, Stewart Copeland, and Sting as they dabble in reggae, rock, and jazz throughout but never enough to fully commit one way or the other. In my opinion, the result is extraordinarily appealing to the inner musician and producer, but one must ask: “Does this truly validate the album’s actual message?”.
Such answers won’t be found from just listening to the album, but doing just that might convince you. To be frank, when I hear Ghost in The Machine, I truly sense musicianship and intellect working side-by-side in the very same fashion I would like to see take place in any musician’s life. Should the appeal of music be used to brainwash listeners into a band’s beliefs? I absolutely do not believe so. But I do believe that if an issue is important to someone, they should accordingly make a strong case for it, which should in turn create for themselves a reflection of their very character. But I urge that one must exercise discernment in these matters as far as whether or not there’s actual benefit in agreeing with what’s being thrown at you.
As mentioned before, today’s music seems to offer quite a different experience when it comes to pushing a particular point. Billy Johnson from Rolling Stone explains the stark contrast to Snoop Dogg’s former message of violence and his “Snoop Lion” persona in the anti-gun anthem “No Guns Allowed”. While promoting a message of peace certainly does not seem bad, the wolf in sheep’s clothing his time would appear to be the credibility of the artist. The message is not only entirely opposite to Snoop Dogg’s previous message, the music is as well, and the difference is as blatantly obvious as the artist’s promoted image or rather, his current rendition of it. While I wish to leave no ill will towards artists choosing to change their views or undergo personal transformations, I simply leave the reader to determine what is genuine and what should be personally received.
Works Cited
Browning, B. (1980, October 30). ‘Ghost in the Machine’ Retrieved February 21, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1981/10/30/ghost-in-the-machine/4ed9943e-558b-47c4-846e-f1593ec9de70/
Johnson, B., Jr. (2013, March 25). Snoop Lion Explains Anti-Violence Song ‘No Guns Allowed’ Retrieved February 21, 2016, from http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/snoop-lion-explains-anti-violence-song-no-guns-allowed-20130325